Business loss carry-forward survives a shift from sole proprietorship to partnership where the same business continues

A business loss incurred by an assessee as sole proprietor remained eligible for carry-forward and set-off when the same concern was later carried on in partnership, because continuity of the business identity was preserved. The change from proprietorship to partnership did not break the statutory requirement where the going concern, assets and liabilities, and business substance remained the same; only the persons carrying on the business changed. The court therefore held that the assessee could set off the carried-forward loss against his share of partnership profits, subject to the statutory conditions being satisfied.

---

---

Issues: Whether a loss sustained by an assessee while carrying on a business as sole proprietor could be carried forward and set off under section 24(2) against his share of profits when the same business was thereafter carried on by him in partnership with another.

Analysis: The decisive requirement under section 24(2) was that the business in which the loss was originally sustained must continue to be carried on by the assessee in the relevant later year. The business here remained the same in substance: the partnership took over the running concern as a going business with its assets and liabilities, and the deed itself showed an intention to preserve continuity. The change was only in the persons carrying on the business, not in the identity of the business. A business carried on by a partnership is carried on by the partners, and in the case of a registered firm the partner, not the firm as such, is assessed on his share of income. The proviso to section 24(2) also supported the view that a person who had incurred the loss could claim the set-off where the business was thereafter carried on in altered form, provided the statutory conditions were satisfied.

Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to carry forward and set off the business loss against his share of profits from the partnership.

Final Conclusion: The reference was answered by holding that the statutory conditions for set-off were satisfied when the assessee continued the same business through a registered partnership and claimed relief only to the extent of his own share of profits.

Ratio Decidendi: For purposes of carry-forward and set-off of business loss, continuity of the same business is not destroyed merely because the business is thereafter carried on in partnership; the loss-incurring assessee may claim the benefit if the business identity continues and the statutory conditions are otherwise fulfilled.

---