Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether input tax credit already availed by a purchasing dealer can be reversed or denied merely because the selling dealer's registration was cancelled retrospectively.
Analysis: The dispute turned on whether retrospective cancellation of the selling dealer's registration could affect a purchaser who had bought goods from a registered dealer and had availed input tax credit on the strength of the registration certificate then in force. The governing principle applied was that a purchasing dealer is entitled to rely on the seller's valid registration certificate, and a later retrospective cancellation cannot operate to the prejudice of a person who acted on the basis of that existing registration. The Court followed the earlier binding view that reversal of input tax credit cannot rest only on retrospective cancellation of the seller's registration.
Conclusion: The denial or reversal of input tax credit on the ground of retrospective cancellation of the selling dealer's registration was not sustainable, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The assessment orders were set aside to the extent they denied input tax credit on this ground, and the writ petitions were allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: Retrospective cancellation of a seller's registration does not defeat the input tax credit lawfully availed by a purchasing dealer who acted on the strength of the registration certificate while it was current.