1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal removes penalty for non-maintenance of books of account under Income-tax Act</h1> The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal against the penalty imposed under section 271A of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 2006-07. The ... - Issues involved: Appeal against penalty u/s 271A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for assessment year 2006-07.The appellant, an individual engaged in marketing machine tools and other items, filed a return declaring commission income on a presumptive basis u/s 44AF at 5%. During scrutiny, it was found that section 44AF applied only to retail business, not to the appellant's business. The Assessing Officer determined the net income at &8377; 37,25,096/- and taxable income at &8377; 39,24,680/-, higher than the declared amounts. A penalty of &8377; 25,000/- was imposed for non-maintenance of books of account u/s 44A(2)(i), which was upheld by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals).The appellant contended that there was a genuine belief that books of account were not required and cooperated in recalculating income upon realizing the error. It was argued that there was a reasonable cause for the failure to maintain regular books of account, and thus, the penalty should be deleted.After careful consideration, the Tribunal found no reason to uphold the penalty as the appellant's bona fide belief was not disputed. Referring to sections 273B and 271A of the Act, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's order and directed the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty of &8377; 25,000/-.In conclusion, the appellant's appeal was allowed, and the penalty was removed by the Tribunal.