Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Tribunal overturns tax disallowance on vehicle hire charges, assessee's appeal successful.</h1> <h3>Shri Govind Singh, S/o. Shri Jaswant Singh, Versus Income Tax Officer 3 (2), Mathura.</h3> Shri Govind Singh, S/o. Shri Jaswant Singh, Versus Income Tax Officer 3 (2), Mathura. - TMI Issues involved:The appeal filed by the assessee against the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-I, Agra for the Assessment Year 2007-08. The main issue raised by the assessee is the disallowance of `24,96,000/- u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.Details of the Judgment:Applicability of Section 194-C and 194-I:The assessee derived income from plying passenger vehicles and had taken contracts for providing and operating passenger vehicles on hire basis. The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim of `24,96,000/- under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, stating that the assessee was liable to deduct tax u/s 194C but failed to do so. Additionally, the Assessing Officer viewed that section 194-I is applicable due to the amended provision from 13.07.2006. The CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) based on section 194-I. However, the Tribunal found that section 194-I was wrongly applied as it does not cover vehicle hire charges. The order of the I.T.A.T. in a similar case supported the assessee's position, leading to the deletion of the demand and interest. The Tribunal held that section 194-I was not applicable to vehicle hire charges, and thus, the addition made by the Assessing Officer was deleted, resulting in no disallowance under section 40(a)(ia).Conclusion:The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee based on the findings that section 194-I was wrongly applied to vehicle hire charges, leading to the deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer. Therefore, no disallowance was warranted under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act.