TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court Upholds Disallowance of Pre-1970 Expenditure Deduction</h1> The High Court affirmed the Assessing Officer's decision to disallow the Assessee's claim for deduction under section 35D for expenditure reimbursed to ... - Issues:1. Interpretation of eligibility for relief u/s 35D for reimbursed amounts incurred by promoters before 1.4.1970.2. Entitlement to deduction u/s 35D for specific amounts.3. Eligibility for development rebate on certain amounts.Issue 1:The High Court considered whether the Assessee, a Public Limited Company, could claim a deduction u/s 35D for expenditure reimbursed to promoters after 31st March 1970, even though the expenditure was initially incurred by the promoters before 1.4.1970. The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim, stating that since the expenditure was incurred by the Assessee after 31st March 1970, it did not qualify for the deduction u/s 35D. The Court affirmed this view, noting a statutory bar against deduction for expenses incurred before 1.4.1970.Issue 2:The Assessee argued that as it was incorporated after the specified date, it could only incur the expenditure after accepting the liability from the promoters, which happened post 31st March 1970. The Revenue contended that since the promoters incurred the expenditure before 31st March 1970, the Assessee's reimbursement did not entitle it to a deduction u/s 35D. The Court analyzed Section 35D, emphasizing the requirement that expenditure must be incurred after 31st March 1970 for the deduction, and noted the distinction between pre and post-incorporation liabilities.Issue 3:Regarding the development rebate, the Tribunal had held that the Assessee was not entitled to it on specific amounts. The Court referenced a previous judgment to support the Assessee's position, indicating that the issue was covered by precedent.The Court's decision was based on the interpretation of statutory provisions and the timing of expenditure in relation to incorporation and acceptance of liability. The judgment clarified the conditions for deductions u/s 35D and highlighted the legal principles regarding pre-incorporation liabilities and income.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
