TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Credit for Plant Maintenance Admissible: Tribunal Overturns Disallowance Decision</h1> <h3>M/s Orient Cement Ltd., Adilabad district Versus The Commissioner C.C. E&ST, Hyderabad-I</h3> M/s Orient Cement Ltd., Adilabad district Versus The Commissioner C.C. E&ST, Hyderabad-I - TMI Issues:1. Disallowance of credit availed on MS items used for repair and maintenance.Analysis:The appellant, engaged in cement and clinker manufacturing, availed Cenvat credit on MS items for repair and maintenance, but faced disallowance. The original authority disallowed the credit, imposing penalties and confirming a demand. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this decision, leading to the present appeal.The appellant argued that the MS items were crucial for manufacturing capital goods and for repair and maintenance activities, essential for continuous manufacturing operations. They highlighted that without these items, breakdowns and interruptions in manufacturing would occur. Citing various judgments, the appellant contended that the credit availed was proper and correct.On the contrary, the respondent argued that MS items did not fall under the category of inputs as per the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. They emphasized the distinction between repair and maintenance activities and manufacturing, supporting the disallowance of credit on MS items.The issue before the Tribunal was whether the credit availed on MS items for repair and maintenance of plant and machinery was admissible. Referring to legal precedents, the Tribunal noted that credit on steel sheets and coal used for repair and maintenance of capital goods was deemed admissible. The Tribunal also highlighted a Supreme Court case regarding the interpretation of 'inputs,' concluding that the word 'includes' in the definition was not restrictive. Based on these judgments, the Tribunal held that the credit availed on MS items for repair and maintenance was admissible.Consequently, the impugned order disallowing the credit was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential reliefs.
TaxTMI 