Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Assistant Commissioner could validly exercise suo motu revision under section 67 after a final determination under section 62 had already been made, and whether the later Tribunal view could reopen that concluded position.
Analysis: Section 62(1) authorises the Commissioner to determine the rate of tax or taxability of a particular sale or purchase, and section 62(3) gives finality to such determination by barring re-agitation except through the statutory remedies of appeal or revision against the order. The assessee had already obtained a final determination in its favour under section 62, and the department did not challenge that order by appeal under section 65(1)(c). In those circumstances, the Assistant Commissioner could not disregard the concluded determination and reopen the matter merely because a later Tribunal decision had taken a different view in another case. The scope of suo motu revision under section 67 could not be used to unsettle a final inter partes decision.
Conclusion: The suo motu revision was not maintainable, and the assessee's favourably concluded determination under section 62 could not be reopened.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the assessee on the jurisdictional issue, and the taxability question was left unanswered as unnecessary.
Ratio Decidendi: A tax determination made final under the statutory provision conferring finality cannot be reopened through suo motu revision where the statute provides exclusive appellate or revisional remedies and no such remedy was pursued.