Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for assessment year 2003-04, depreciation had to be taken into account while computing deduction under Chapter VIA of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether the Revenue's challenge on the remand relating to interest income deserved interference.
Analysis: The assessee had not claimed depreciation in earlier years, and the depreciation thrust upon it in those years had already been deleted by the Tribunal and had attained finality. In that situation, the Tribunal was justified in holding that, for the year in question, depreciation had to be computed on the written down value determined on the footing that depreciation had not been thrust upon the assessee in the earlier assessment orders. As regards the interest-income issue, the Tribunal merely restored the matter to the Assessing Officer, and the fresh order was to take into account the binding judgment of the Court in Asian Star Ltd.
Conclusion: The first question was answered against the Revenue and the second question was not entertained; the Revenue's appeal failed.