Assessment order invalidated due to company merger resulting in dissolution. ITAT allows assessee's appeal.

The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and dismissed the revenue's appeal in a case involving cross-appeals against the CIT(A) order for Assessment Year 2004-05. The ITAT held that the assessment order against a non-existent entity post-merger was invalid, as the company had legally merged with another entity, resulting in its dissolution. Consequently, the assessment order was deemed null and void. As a result, the ITAT quashed the assessment proceedings, leading to the allowance of the assessee's appeal and the dismissal of the revenue's appeal.

---

---

Issues involved:
Cross-appeals by assessee and revenue against CIT(A) order for Assessment Year 2004-05. Additional ground raised regarding assessment order jurisdiction due to non-existent entity post-merger. Admissibility of legal ground raised for the first time. Validity of assessment order against non-existent entity.

Analysis:

1. Admissibility of additional ground: The assessee raised an additional ground before the ITAT regarding the assessment order's jurisdiction due to the non-existence of the entity post-merger. The CIT(A) did not adjudicate on this ground as it was not pressed. The ITAT admitted the legal ground for consideration based on precedents allowing questions of law raised for the first time to be adjudicated.

2. Validity of assessment order: The ITAT considered the issue of whether the assessment order against a non-existent entity post-merger was valid. The assessee contended that the company had merged with another entity as per the Delhi High Court order. Citing relevant case law, the ITAT held that once a company is dissolved post-merger, any action in its name is void. The assessment order against the non-existent entity was deemed null and void in the eyes of the law.

3. Merger and legal entity status: The ITAT noted that the assessee company had merged with another entity as per the Companies Act, 1956, and the Delhi High Court order. The merger resulted in the dissolution of the assessee company as a legal entity from 1st April 2005. As the assessment order was passed after this date, it was considered a nullity. The ITAT quashed the assessment order based on the legal status of the entity post-merger.

4. Outcome and decision: Due to the quashing of the assessment proceedings, the ITAT did not adjudicate on other grounds raised by both the assessee and the revenue, deeming them academic. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the revenue's appeal was dismissed based on the invalidity of the assessment order against a non-existent entity post-merger. The ITAT pronounced the order in favor of the assessee on 4th March 2015.

---