1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Successful Challenge to Alleged Household Expenses Addition Under Section 132</h1> The challenge to the impugned orders of Ld. CIT (A) under section 132 of the Act for alleged household expenses addition was successful. The appeals filed ... - Issues involved: Challenge to impugned orders of Ld. CIT (A) u/s.132 of Act for alleged household expenses addition.Controversy in Assessment Years 2007-08 and 2008-09:The appeals were filed challenging the addition of Rs. 1,50,000/- made by the A.O. for alleged household expenses, sustained at 30% by Ld. C.I.T.(A).Facts and Observations:- Search and seizure action u/s.132 of Act on 05.03.2009 in the cases of Jai Corp Group.- A.O. observed the group's substantial land purchase through the assessee.- Assessee's return declared total income of Rs. 1,50,426/- with no undisclosed income.- A.O. made an addition of Rs. 1,50,000/- to total income based on family status.- Ld. CIT (A) sustained 30% addition ad-hoc and deleted 70% addition.Judicial Analysis and Decision:- Ld. Counsel withdrew ground no.1 in both appeals.- Lack of evidence on family size, monthly expenditure, and status led to deletion of 30% addition.- Judicial propriety required justification for any addition, leading to deletion of Ld. CIT (A)'s sustained addition.- Ground no.2 allowed, and Ground no.3 deemed consequential.- Both appeals of the assessee were allowed.Conclusion:The addition of Rs. 1,50,000/- for alleged household expenses was deleted in both assessment years, and the appeals of the assessee were allowed.