Sawdust not liable for excise duty under T.I. 68 - Supreme Court ruling overturns Appellate Tribunal decision The Supreme Court held that sawn paratty and sawdust are not liable to excise duty as they do not qualify as manufactured products under T.I. 68. The ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Sawdust not liable for excise duty under T.I. 68 - Supreme Court ruling overturns Appellate Tribunal decision
The Supreme Court held that sawn paratty and sawdust are not liable to excise duty as they do not qualify as manufactured products under T.I. 68. The Appellate Tribunal's decision was overturned, and the respondent's appeal was allowed with benefits. (1995 (7) TMI 430 - SC)
The Supreme Court considered whether sawn paratty and saw dust are liable to excise duty under T.I. 68. The Appellate Tribunal ruled that these products, arising during sawing of logs, are not excisable as they are not manufactured by the appellants. The respondent's appeal was allowed with benefits. (Case Citation: 1995 (7) TMI 430 - SC)
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.