2014 (2) TMI 1265 - HC - Income Tax

Court limits disallowance of expenditure for earning dividend income under Section 14A

Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridabad Versus M/s Mascot Footcare,

Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridabad Versus M/s Mascot Footcare, - TMI Issues:Interpretation of Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding disallowance of expenditure for earning dividend income.Analysis:The case involved ITA Nos.56 and 67 of 2009 where the issue was whether the Assessing Officer correctly disallowed the expenditure on interest amounting to Rs. 63,87,408 under section 14A of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2000-01. The CIT(A) held that the AO was not correct in applying section 14A and deleted the disallowance. The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal and directed the AO to restrict the disallowance to the expenditure incurred for earning dividend of Rs. 7200. The Tribunal relied on the case of M/s Lakhani Marketing Inc. to support its decision.The CIT(A) emphasized the need for a nexus between the expenditure incurred and the income exempt under the Act. The Tribunal highlighted the conditions for invoking section 14A, stating that unless there is receipt of exempted income, the section cannot be invoked. It also noted that the AO failed to establish a nexus between invested funds and interest-bearing funds. The Tribunal concluded that the interest could not have been disallowed for the assessment year 2001-02 and directed the disallowance for the assessment year 2000-01 to be restricted to the expenditure for earning dividend of Rs. 7200.The High Court upheld the decisions of the CIT(A) and the Tribunal, emphasizing that in the case of assessment year 2000-01, since the assessee received a dividend of Rs. 7200, the expenditure on interest liability should be disallowed to that extent. The Court also referred to previous judgments to support the view that disallowance under section 14A requires a finding of incurring of expenditure for earning exempted income. The Court dismissed the appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the revenue.In conclusion, the judgment clarified the application of section 14A of the Income Tax Act, highlighting the necessity of a nexus between expenditure and exempted income. The decisions of the CIT(A) and the Tribunal were upheld, emphasizing that disallowance under section 14A cannot stand if no expenditure has been incurred for earning exempted income. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of the facts and legal principles involved in determining the correct disallowance of expenditure for earning dividend income.