Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether octroi refund could be denied on the ground that goods imported only for eventual export had been sold within the municipal limits and the importer and exporter were not the same person.
Analysis: Octroi is a tax on the entry of goods into a municipal area for consumption, use or sale therein. The refund scheme under the Octroi Rules permits refund where goods are imported for temporary detention and are in fact exported in accordance with the prescribed procedure. The condition in the export/refund rules requiring the importer and exporter to be the same person and prohibiting change of ownership must be read consistently with the law that goods brought into the local area solely for re-export are not exigible to octroi. Where the goods are not brought in for use or consumption within the municipal limits, but are imported only for eventual export and are duly exported after compliance with the prescribed formalities, a sale within the municipal area does not by itself defeat the refund claim.
Conclusion: The refund could not be refused merely because the goods were sold within the municipal limits before export. The petitioner was entitled to refund of the octroi deposited.
Ratio Decidendi: Octroi is not leviable on goods brought into the municipal area solely for re-export, and compliance with the refund procedure cannot be negated merely by a change in ownership where the goods were never imported for use or consumption within the area.