1981 (2) TMI 243 - SC - Indian Laws

Supreme Court rules on Terminal Tax legality for goods passing through Delhi

Man Mohan Tuli Versus Municipal Corporation of Delhi & ors.

The Supreme Court ruled in a case concerning the legality of Terminal Tax levied by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi. The Court held that the tax cannot ... - Issues Involved:1. Legality of the Terminal Tax levied by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi.2. Interpretation of Section 178 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957.3. Applicability of Terminal Tax on goods merely passing through Delhi.4. Consideration of the High Court's judgment on the imposition of Terminal Tax.Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:1. Legality of the Terminal Tax levied by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi:The appeals challenge the orders dated May 23, 1975, and July 7, 1975, by the Terminal Tax Officer, Municipal Corporation of Delhi, which directed the setup of a Terminal Tax post at the entrance to the appellant's land to collect terminal tax on goods carried into that land. The High Court quashed these orders, and the Supreme Court upheld this portion of the High Court's judgment, albeit on different grounds.2. Interpretation of Section 178 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957:Section 178(1) states: 'On and from the date of the establishment of the Corporation under section 3, there shall be levied on all goods carried by railway or road into the Union Territory of Delhi from any place outside thereof, a terminal tax at the rates specified in the Tenth Schedule.' The Supreme Court emphasized that taxing statutes must be strictly interpreted, giving every benefit of doubt to the taxpayer. The term 'goods carried into the Union Territory of Delhi' was interpreted to mean that the final destination of the goods must be Delhi for the terminal tax to be applicable.3. Applicability of Terminal Tax on goods merely passing through Delhi:The Court held that terminal tax could not be levied on goods merely passing through Delhi to other destinations. The goods must have Delhi as their final destination for the tax to be applicable. The Court cited various precedents to support this interpretation, emphasizing that terminal tax is similar to octroi duty, which is levied on goods entering a local area for consumption, use, or sale.4. Consideration of the High Court's judgment on the imposition of Terminal Tax:The High Court had justified the imposition of terminal tax on the grounds that the goods entered the territory of Delhi, even if their final destination was beyond Delhi. The Supreme Court disagreed with this interpretation, stating that the High Court's view was 'patently wrong' and did not flow from the plain language of Section 178. The Supreme Court concluded that:- The High Court was wrong in interpreting Section 178 to justify the imposition of terminal tax on goods merely passing through Delhi.- The High Court erred in holding that goods unloaded, sorted, and reloaded in Delhi became exigible to terminal tax.- Rule 26 of the Terminal Tax Rules, which exempts goods intended for immediate export, must be interpreted liberally to imply a reasonable period for export.Conclusion:The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, set aside the impugned judgment except for the portion quashing the impugned orders, and upheld the quashing of the orders on different grounds. The Court clarified that terminal tax is not leviable on goods merely passing through Delhi and that Section 178 does not contemplate such a levy. There was no order as to costs.