Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee had discharged the burden under Explanation 2 to Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was attracted on the facts of the case.
Analysis: The Tribunal had set aside the penalty on the basis that the assessee had successfully discharged the negative burden under Explanation 2 to Section 271(1)(c). The question whether that burden stood discharged was treated as essentially one of fact, and the factual finding recorded by the Tribunal on that aspect was accepted.
Conclusion: The questions were answered in the affirmative, in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.