Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty and stay of recovery pending appeal.
Analysis: The demand arose from denial of the benefit of Notification No. 89/95 dated 18.05.1995 in respect of waste products generated during manufacture of rice bran oil. The Tribunal noted that an identical issue had already been decided by the same Bench in favour of the assessee, holding that such waste products were eligible for the benefit of the notification. In view of that earlier view and the material on record, the appellant was found to have established a prima facie case for interim relief.
Conclusion: The application for waiver of pre-deposit was allowed and recovery of the disputed amounts was stayed till disposal of the appeal, in favour of the assessee.