We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic • Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced • Includes everything in Basic • Detailed report covering: - Overview Summary - Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars] - Relevant Case Laws - Tariff / Classification / HSN - Expert views from TaxTMI - Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
<h1>Review petition dismissed by Allahabad HC for lack of error. Petitioner has one month to appeal.</h1> The Allahabad HC dismissed the review petition for lack of apparent error on record. The petitioner has one month to appeal based on a Division Bench's ... Error apparent on the face of the record - review under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC - power of appellate forum to consider precedentError apparent on the face of the record - review under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC - Review petition under Order XLVII Rule 1 C.P.C. dismissed for absence of any error apparent on the face of the record. - HELD THAT: - The Court examined whether there was any error apparent on the face of the record warranting interference under Order XLVII Rule 1 C.P.C. The Court found no such error and observed that the submissions of the petitioner, including reliance on a Division Bench judgment in another matter, did not establish an apparent error in the impugned order. Consequently, the ground for review under the statutory provision was not made out.Review petition dismissed for want of any error apparent on the face of the record.Power of appellate forum to consider precedent - Appellate forum permitted to consider the Division Bench judgment relied upon by the petitioner in the appeal. - HELD THAT: - Although the Court rejected the review application, it recorded that the Division Bench judgment invoked by the petitioner may be considered by the appellate forum when deciding the substantive appeal. The Court therefore allowed the petitioner the procedural opportunity to prefer an appeal against the impugned order and indicated that the precedential material could be placed before the appellate court for its consideration.Petitioner granted liberty to prefer an appeal and the appellate forum may consider the relied-upon Division Bench judgment.Final Conclusion: The review petition is dismissed for lack of any error apparent on the face of the record; the petitioner is permitted to prefer an appeal within one month and the appellate forum may consider the Division Bench judgment relied upon by the petitioner. The Allahabad High Court dismissed the review petition as there was no apparent error on the face of the record. The petitioner can appeal within one month based on a Division Bench's judgment in the case of M/s Luxmi Oil & Vanaspati (Pvt.) Limited.
TaxTMI 
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
