TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a pre-deposit order under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1963 could be sustained when the customs authorities were already in possession of the goods.
Analysis: The appellate order required a deposit of Rs. 20,00,000/- under Section 129E. The record showed that the customs authorities were in possession of 270 bales of goods, and part of the goods had already been ordered to be released. On these facts, the Court held that a further pre-deposit could not properly be claimed or directed.
Conclusion: The pre-deposit direction was unjustified and was set aside, in favour of the appellant.
TaxTMI 
