Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the bank guarantee was unconditional and invocable on demand, and whether injunction could be granted restraining its encashment.
Analysis: The guarantee was required to secure timely delivery, erection, commissioning and performance, but its operative clauses provided that the guarantor would pay the stipulated amount on demand without demur, that the purchaser would be the sole judge of default, and that disputes pending between the parties would not suspend the purchaser's right to recover under the guarantee. The reference in the preamble to the underlying contract did not convert the guarantee into a conditional one. An injunction against invocation of a bank guarantee can be granted only in exceptional cases of established fraud or irretrievable injury, and no such foundation was laid in the pleadings or evidence. The dispute between the parties regarding alleged breach of contractual obligations could not control the independent obligation undertaken by the bank under the guarantee.
Conclusion: The bank guarantee was held to be unconditional, and the injunction restraining its encashment was held unsustainable. The order of the High Court was set aside and the purchaser was permitted to invoke the guarantee.
Ratio Decidendi: An unconditional bank guarantee must be honoured according to its terms, and courts will not restrain its invocation merely because disputes exist under the underlying contract unless fraud or irretrievable injury is clearly established.