TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal adjusts interest income, upholds disallowance of business loss</h1> <h3>Smt. Indra Jalan Versus ITO, Ward 29 (4), Kolkata.</h3> The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee's appeal, adjusting the interest income to only Rs. 6,24,251 for the Assessment Year under consideration, ... - Issues Involved:1. Taxability of interest income.2. Disallowance of business loss.Summary:Issue 1: Taxability of Interest IncomeThe assessee contested the taxability of interest income of Rs. 11,24,251 u/s 'income from other sources.' The assessee had advanced a loan to M/s. Soorajmull Nagarmull in 1959, but due to heavy losses, the debtor firm could not repay the loan with interest. The Calcutta High Court appointed a Receiver who sold some shares and paid Rs. 11,91,271 to the assessee in the Assessment Year under consideration. The Assessing Officer, after deducting legal fees of Rs. 67,020, assessed the net interest income of Rs. 11,24,251 under 'income from other sources.' The assessee argued that the interest should be taxed on an accrual basis due to the mercantile system of accounting. However, the CIT(A) held that since the assessee did not offer the interest income on an accrual basis in earlier years, it was rightfully taxed in the year of receipt. The Tribunal modified the orders, directing that only Rs. 6,24,251, excluding the principal amount of Rs. 5 lakhs, be assessed as income for the Assessment Year under consideration.Issue 2: Disallowance of Business LossThe assessee, aged 65, claimed a business loss of Rs. 13,56,841 from the purchase and sale of suiting and shirting. The Assessing Officer found the transactions to be non-genuine, stating that the assessee conducted business only for a few days with non-entities and without any incidental expenses like transportation or brokerage. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, agreeing that the business loss was created to set off the substantial interest income. The Tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)'s order, rejecting the claim of business loss due to lack of genuine transactions and adequate opportunity provided to the assessee to prove otherwise.Conclusion:The appeal of the assessee was allowed in part, with the interest income being partially adjusted and the business loss disallowance being upheld.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
