TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal overturns addition for unexplained purchases in favor of assessee</h1> <h3>M/s. Imperial Imp & Exp. Versus The ITO 20 (1) (5), Mumbai.</h3> M/s. Imperial Imp & Exp. Versus The ITO 20 (1) (5), Mumbai. - TMI Issues:Confirmation of addition of estimated profit on unexplained purchases.Analysis:1. The appeal was against the CIT(Appeals) order confirming an addition of Rs. 4,19,356 as estimated profit on unexplained purchases.2. The appellant, a partnership firm engaged in the export business, filed a return declaring a total income of Rs. 3,49,320 for the Assessment Year 2009-10. The Assessing Officer reopened the assessment, alleging accommodation purchase bills of Rs. 77,51,496 from four parties were bogus. The Assessing Officer computed a profit margin of Rs. 9,68,937 on these purchases, which the CIT(A) reduced to Rs. 4,19,356, applying a gross profit rate of 5.41%.3. The appellant contended that all sales were exports, thus no liability towards sales tax existed on its purchases. The appellant argued that similar cases before the Tribunal resulted in deletion of additions. The Departmental Representative supported the lower authorities' orders, citing information from the Sales Tax Department of Maharashtra.4. The Tribunal noted that no independent inquiries were conducted by the Assessing Officer regarding the transactions with the four parties. The Tribunal found no evidence supporting the bogus purchase claims, especially considering the appellant's export-oriented sales, documented payments, and lack of cross-examination opportunities. Relying on previous decisions, the Tribunal held that the CIT(A) erred in sustaining the addition and directed the deletion of the entire amount added by the Assessing Officer.5. As the appeal succeeded on the merits of the addition, the challenge against the initiation of proceedings under section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act was rendered academic and not adjudicated. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the key issues, arguments presented, findings of the Tribunal, and the final decision rendered in favor of the appellant.
TaxTMI 