Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the assessee was entitled to relief under section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in respect of cellulose film plant No. 4. (ii) Whether the relief under section 80J could be restricted proportionately for part of the year.
Issue (i): Whether the assessee was entitled to relief under section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in respect of cellulose film plant No. 4.
Analysis: The finding in the earlier proceedings that plant No. 4 was not a new industrial undertaking, but only an expansion of an existing business, had already been affirmed in prior litigation concerning the same assessee and the same plant. On that basis, the claim for relief under section 80J stood concluded against the assessee.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to relief under section 80J in respect of cellulose film plant No. 4.
Issue (ii): Whether the relief under section 80J could be restricted proportionately for part of the year.
Analysis: Since the foundational claim to deduction under section 80J itself failed on the ground that the plant was not a new industrial undertaking, the question of allowing any proportionate relief for part of the year did not assist the assessee.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to any proportionate relief under section 80J for part of the year.
Final Conclusion: Both questions were answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue, leaving the assessee without relief under section 80J.
Ratio Decidendi: Relief under section 80J is unavailable where the unit is found to be only an expansion of an existing business and not a new industrial undertaking.