TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Upholds Disallowance of Expenses & Revenue's Appeal Dismissed</h1> <h3>Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle–4 (1), Aayakar Bhavan Mumbai Versus M/s. Alka Securities Ltd.</h3> The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decisions regarding the disallowance of expenses under section 14A r.w.rule 8D and disallowance under ... - Issues involved: Disallowance of expenses u/s 14A r.w.rule 8D, Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) in respect of NSE settlement & Leaseline chargesIssue 1: Disallowance of expenses u/s 14A r.w.rule 8DThe Revenue appealed against the deletion of expenses disallowance amounting to Rs. 9,09,083 u/s 14A r.w.rule 8D. The Commissioner (Appeals) restricted the disallowance to 5% of the dividend income, stating that rule 8D is not applicable. The Revenue contested this decision, but the Tribunal declined to interfere, citing the smallness of the matter and the Commissioner's reasoning based on Tribunal decisions.Issue 2: Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) in respect of NSE settlement & Leaseline chargesThe Revenue challenged the deletion of disallowance amounting to Rs. 5,79,525 u/s 40(a)(ia) for NSE settlement & Leaseline charges. The Commissioner (Appeals) ruled in favor of the assessee, considering the nature of the services provided by the stock exchange and the fact that TDS was not deducted. The Tribunal referred to a similar case where disallowance was not upheld under section 40(a)(ia) for similar charges, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal.In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the decisions of the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding both issues, resulting in the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
