Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty could be sustained under Section 15-A(1)(o) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act when the declaration form was left blank by the seller and there was no material showing an attempt to evade tax.
Analysis: Penalty under Section 15-A(1)(o) required a proven attempt to evade tax. The declaration form had been sent by the purchaser for completion by the seller on the basis of the invoice, but it remained blank due to the seller's omission. The goods were accompanied by the invoice, bilty and declaration form when the vehicle was intercepted, and there was no material that the driver or the purchaser tried to evade inspection. The inference that the blank form could be used in another transaction was based only on surmise and not on evidence.
Conclusion: The penalty was not sustainable, and the purchaser succeeded on the issue.
Ratio Decidendi: Penalty under Section 15-A(1)(o) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act cannot be imposed unless there is material showing an attempt to evade tax; a blank declaration form, by itself, is insufficient where the purchaser acted bona fide and the supporting documents were produced.