Adventure in the nature of trade applied to share resale profits; isolated transaction still taxed as income.

Profit on sale of shares was treated as taxable income because the surrounding facts showed an adventure in the nature of trade. Although the transaction was isolated, the company never intended to retain the shares, used brokers, arranged sales before completion of purchase, and realised profit through resale in the ordinary commercial manner. The receipt was therefore characterised as commercial trading profit rather than capital appreciation or a casual, non-recurring receipt. The contention that the shares were acquired merely as an incident of the managing agency was rejected, as the share deal remained a distinct profit-making operation.

---

---

Issues: Whether the profit realised on sale of 13,74,000 shares was taxable as income because the transaction was an adventure in the nature of trade; whether the receipt could be treated as capital appreciation or a casual and non-recurring receipt exempt from tax; and whether the contention that the shares were acquired only as an incident of the managing agency altered the character of the receipt.

Analysis: The transaction was an isolated one, but isolation by itself did not prevent it from being an adventure in the nature of trade. The company had no intention from the outset to retain the 13,74,000 shares, no capital of its own or borrowed funds was used in the sense of a capital investment for appreciation, brokers were employed, sales were arranged before completion of the purchase, and a profit was secured by resale in the ordinary commercial manner. The facts justified the inference that the shares were dealt with as if they were stock-in-trade and that the transaction formed part of a scheme for profit-making. The argument that the shares were merely ancillary to the purchase of the managing agency was rejected, because the agreement was composite and interlinked, but the share transaction remained a distinct commercial operation. Authorities dealing with mere intention to resell, capital appreciation, or deductible expenditure under Section 10(2)(xv) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, did not assist the assessee on these facts.

Conclusion: The profit from the sale of the 13,74,000 shares was taxable as income arising from an adventure in the nature of trade, and the assessee failed on the exemption contention.

Final Conclusion: The reference was answered against the assessee, with the profit on the share sales held assessable to tax and costs awarded accordingly.

Ratio Decidendi: In an isolated share transaction, a profit is taxable where the surrounding facts show a commercial venture undertaken from the outset for resale at profit, with the transaction bearing the attributes of trade rather than mere capital appreciation or a casual receipt.

---