Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned orders levying purchase tax under the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 were liable to be set aside and the matters remitted for fresh consideration in the light of the earlier Division Bench ruling.
Analysis: The petitions were disposed of by following the earlier Division Bench decision on the scope of Section 4(4) of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 and its application to declared goods under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The Court did not enter into the merits of each assessment order, and instead held that the appropriate course was for the assessing authorities to reconsider the matters afresh under the governing legal principles, after granting the petitioners an opportunity of being heard.
Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside and the matters were remitted to the concerned authorities for fresh orders in accordance with law and the binding Division Bench decision.