Appellate Tribunal competence limited to appeal grounds; new adverse findings invalid and market value governs purchase price.

Appellate Tribunal competence is limited to grounds raised in the appeal; it cannot make new adverse factual findings or, in effect, enhance assessment on matters not in issue, so an unfounded reduction of share price to Rs. 524-6-0 was beyond its power and set aside. On the pricing question, where shares were treated as stock-in-trade and parties disputed market value versus paid price, the operative purchase price for ascertaining profits is the market value of Rs. 715 per share, not the actual paid price.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the Appellate Tribunal was competent to give a finding that at the relevant date the price of the shares was Rs. 524-6-0 per share and that this was a clear case of under-assessment; (ii) Whether, for the purpose of ascertaining profits, the purchase price of the shares should be taken at Rs. 1,100 per share or Rs. 715 per share.

Issue (i): Whether the Appellate Tribunal could, in the appeal before it, make a finding adverse to the assessee that the price was Rs. 524-6-0 per share and that there was under-assessment when that ground was not raised in the appeal.

Analysis: Section 33(4) empowers the Appellate Tribunal to pass orders on the appeal "thereon"; the Tribunal's power is confined to grounds raised in the appeal. A finding that reduces the price below the lowest ground advanced and thereby exposes the assessee to enhancement or to reopening under section 34 is a finding adverse to the assessee not arising from the grounds before the Tribunal. The Tribunal may uphold a lower authority on any available ground, but it cannot, in effect, enhance assessment or create a new adverse factual finding that was not in issue between the parties before it.

Conclusion: The Tribunal was not competent to give the finding that the price was Rs. 524-6-0 per share and that this was a clear case of under-assessment. This question is answered in the negative.

Issue (ii): The correct purchase price to be taken for computing loss: Rs. 1,100 or Rs. 715 per share.

Analysis: The parties before the lower authorities proceeded on the basis that the shares were stock-in-trade and disputed only whether the market value at acquisition was Rs. 715 or the actual paid price Rs. 1,100. Having considered the material and prior authority on the point, the appropriate purchase price to be accepted for the purpose of ascertaining profits is the market value of Rs. 715 per share.

Conclusion: The purchase price for the purpose of ascertaining profits is Rs. 715 per share and not Rs. 1,100 per share.

Final Conclusion: The Tribunal's adverse finding reducing the price to Rs. 524-6-0 was beyond its competence and set aside; the proper purchase price for the disputed issue is Rs. 715 per share, resulting in the outcome favouring the revenue on the pricing question.

Ratio Decidendi: Under section 33(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 the Appellate Tribunal may pass orders only on grounds raised in the appeal and cannot make new adverse factual findings or effectively enhance assessment in respect of matters not in issue between the parties.

---