Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the income-tax authorities were justified in going behind the apparent contract of sale and allotment of shares to determine the true written down value of the vehicles for allowance under clauses (vi) and (vii) of Section 10(2) of the Income-tax Act.
Analysis: The written down value for depreciation and balancing charge purposes is the actual cost to the assessee. Where assets are transferred in exchange for fully paid-up shares, the tax authorities are not bound in every case by the nominal value of the shares or by the form of the transaction. If the transaction is bona fide, the apparent consideration must ordinarily be accepted; but where the value of the property is deliberately or artificially inflated, the authorities may look behind the transfer and ascertain the real value of the assets. The prohibition against issuing shares at a discount supports this approach, because an inflated valuation used to justify an excessive allotment of shares cannot control the computation of taxable allowances.
Conclusion: The authorities were entitled to disregard the inflated book value and determine the true cost of the vehicles for purposes of Section 10(2)(vi) and Section 10(2)(vii); the answer to the reference was in the affirmative, in favour of the Revenue.