TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Invalid Service of Notice under Section 21; Revision Allowed; Proceedings Set Aside</h1> <h3>Arjun Lal Upadhya Versus Commissioner of Sales Tax, U.P.</h3> The High Court of Allahabad allowed the revision, holding that service of notice under Section 21 on the dealer's counsel was invalid due to an amendment ... - The High Court of Allahabad allowed the revision against an order by the Sales Tax Tribunal, stating that service of notice under Section 21 on the dealer's counsel was invalid after an amendment to Rule 77-A in 1979. The court set aside the proceedings under Section 21 for the assessment year 1975-76. (Citation: 1987 (1) TMI 488 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT)
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
