Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent-assessee was entitled to the benefits under the Sales Tax Incentive Scheme, 1987 in view of the retrospective amendment made by the subsequent notification, and whether the revision petition by the Revenue had any merit.
Analysis: The notification dated 23.05.1987 was retrospectively amended by the notification dated 11.04.2007, and the amendment was issued in public interest to confer benefits on similarly situated assessees. The same notification and amendment had already been considered in earlier decisions, where the benefit under the incentive scheme was upheld. In that setting, the Tax Board's view that the assessee remained entitled to the scheme benefits was found to be correct, and the legal issue was treated as covered against the Revenue.
Conclusion: The respondent-assessee was held entitled to the benefit of the incentive scheme, and the Revenue's revision failed.
Final Conclusion: The question of law was answered in favour of the respondent-assessee, and the revision petition was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: A retrospective amendment issued in public interest to an incentive notification must be given full effect, and where the legal issue is covered by prior binding decisions on the same notification, the assessee is entitled to the resulting benefits.