Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be availed on scrap inputs when the documents did not show the amount of duty paid and there was no provision for deemed credit under the applicable order.
Analysis: The inputs were purchased from a public sector supplier whose sale documents described the goods as duty paid, but the documents did not specify the duty amount or rate. The assessee itself proceeded on the basis of the lowest rate of duty. The record also showed that there was no provision for allowing deemed credit for the relevant item under Order No. 342/1/88-TRU dated 20-5-88. In the absence of reliable documentary evidence establishing payment of duty on the inputs, the claimed credit could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The Modvat credit was not allowable and the finding disallowing the credit was upheld.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed as the claim for credit was unsupported by proof of duty payment and no deemed credit benefit was available.
Ratio Decidendi: Credit cannot be allowed where payment of duty on inputs is not established by evidence and the governing scheme does not provide deemed credit.