1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Court sets aside promotion to Associate Professor in Neuro Surgery for lacking mandatory qualification, emphasizes statutory compliance</h1> The High Court set aside the appellant's promotion to Associate Professor in Neuro Surgery due to the absence of the mandatory M.Ch. qualification, ... - Issues Involved: Promotion criteria for the post of Associate Professor in Neuro Surgery based on qualifications and experience.Summary:The appellant, an Assistant Professor, was promoted to Associate Professor in Neuro Surgery, which was challenged by Dr. Basant Kumar Singh through a writ petition. The High Court set aside the appellant's promotion and directed a fresh consideration based on qualifications. The key issue was whether the appellant, lacking the super-speciality qualification of M.Ch., could be promoted. The Medical Council of India's regulations under Section 33 of the Indian Medical Council Act were crucial in determining the eligibility criteria for the post of Associate Professor.The appellant argued that the requirement of M.Ch. qualification was not mandatory for promotion based on their extensive experience. However, the Court emphasized the importance of clear statutory language, stating that the regulation intended M.Ch. as a prerequisite for teaching or guiding in the subject. Referring to a previous case, the Court upheld the necessity of specific qualifications for promotion in super-specialities.The Court clarified that the Medical Council of India's regulations take precedence in the absence of specific statutory rules by the State Government. Since the appellant did not hold the required M.Ch. qualification, the High Court's direction to reconsider the promotion was deemed appropriate. The judgment in a previous case regarding M.Ch. qualification in Neuro Surgery was applied to the present situation, leading to the dismissal of the appellant's appeal.In conclusion, the Court upheld the decision to set aside the appellant's promotion as Associate Professor in Neuro Surgery due to the lack of the mandatory M.Ch. qualification, in line with the Medical Council of India's regulations.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
