Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether aluminium foil backed on one side with printed polyester film and on the other side with high density polyethylene film was classifiable under Heading 7607.60 of the Central Excise Tariff or under Heading 39.20 of the Central Excise Tariff.
Analysis: The classification dispute was treated as covered by an earlier Tribunal decision holding that the same product was classifiable under Heading 7607.60. That view had also been followed in another Tribunal decision, and the prevailing position on classification was therefore regarded as settled. In that background, no infirmity was found in the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) accepting Heading 7607.60.
Conclusion: The product was held classifiable under Heading 7607.60 of the Central Excise Tariff, not under Heading 39.20, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was rejected and the classification in favour of the assessee stood affirmed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a composite laminated product has already been classified by binding or consistently followed precedent, that settled classification will be maintained in the absence of any distinguishing feature.