TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Bombay HC remands case for tribunal review over Clause 19 interpretation. Appellant's arguments on mark assignment & registration not considered.</h1> <h3>Capital Controls India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise</h3> The Bombay HC remanded the matter back to the tribunal for reconsideration due to failure to properly interpret Clause 19 of the agreement. The ... - The Bombay High Court remanded the matter back to the tribunal for de novo consideration according to law as the true import of Clause 19 of the agreement dated 9th January, 1996 was not considered. The appellant had been assigned the mark and it was subsequently registered in their name in India. The appellant's submissions, including references to Supreme Court judgments and the issue of limitation, were not considered by the tribunal. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
