Bombay HC remands case for tribunal review over Clause 19 interpretation. Appellant's arguments on mark assignment & registration not considered. The Bombay HC remanded the matter back to the tribunal for reconsideration due to failure to properly interpret Clause 19 of the agreement. The ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Bombay HC remands case for tribunal review over Clause 19 interpretation. Appellant's arguments on mark assignment & registration not considered.
The Bombay HC remanded the matter back to the tribunal for reconsideration due to failure to properly interpret Clause 19 of the agreement. The appellant's arguments on mark assignment and registration, supported by SC judgments and limitation issues, were not considered. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.
The Bombay High Court remanded the matter back to the tribunal for de novo consideration according to law as the true import of Clause 19 of the agreement dated 9th January, 1996 was not considered. The appellant had been assigned the mark and it was subsequently registered in their name in India. The appellant's submissions, including references to Supreme Court judgments and the issue of limitation, were not considered by the tribunal. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
