1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Delhi HC cites precedent in tax appeal dismissal.</h1> The Delhi HC dismissed the appeal citing precedent in Pepsi India Holdings P. Ltd. v. ACIT (2014) 50 Taxmann.com 299 (Delhi). - tmi Notice u/s 153C β Search and seizure u/s 132(1) β Satisfaction note - Held that:- Matter stands covered against the Revenue by virtue of the judgment of this Court in Pepsi India Holdings P. Ltd. v. ACIT (2014 (8) TMI 898 - DELHI HIGH COURT) wherein held Tthe finding of photocopies in the possession of a searched person does not necessarily mean and imply that they βbelongβ to the person who holds the originals - Possession of documents and possession of photocopies of documents are two separate things. The finding of photocopies in the possession of a searched person does not necessarily mean and imply that they βbelongβ to the person who holds the originals - Possession of documents and possession of photocopies of documents are two separate things - the ingredients of Section 153C of the Act have not been satisfied - thus, the notice issued u/s 153C is set aside β Decided in favour of Assessee. The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as the matter was covered by a previous judgment in Pepsi India Holdings P. Ltd. v. ACIT (2014) 50 Taxmann.com 299 (Delhi).