1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Keyman Insurance Premium Allowed in Assessment Appeal Decision</h1> The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held ... - Issues involved:The issues involved in this case are u/s 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, enhancement of income, disallowance of premium on Keyman Insurance policy, application of mercantile system of accounting, and the correctness of the order passed by the ld. CIT.Enhancement of Income u/s 263:The appeal was filed against the order passed by the ld. CIT u/s 263, enhancing the income of the assessee. The grounds of appeal included the contention that the assessment was completed under scrutiny u/s 143(3) after due application of mind. The appellant argued that the order was erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue due to lack of proper enquiry and application of mind by the AO.Disallowance of Premium on Keyman Insurance Policy:The ld. CIT disallowed a portion of the premium paid on Keyman Insurance policy, stating that the expenses beyond a certain date were not allowable in the relevant assessment year. The CIT held that expenses must be related to the period under assessment for accrual basis accounting. The disallowed amount was added to the total income of the assessee.Mercantile System of Accounting:The ld. CIT based the disallowance on the mercantile system of accounting, emphasizing that expenses should be debited to the profit and loss account only if they are related to the period under assessment. The CIT noted that the assessee had followed the mercantile system for other expenses but not for the premium paid on the Keyman Insurance policies.Decision:The Tribunal observed that the liability to pay the insurance premium arose and was paid in the year under appeal, in accordance with the mercantile system of accounting followed by the assessee. As the expenses were recognized in the books of account, the order of the ld. CIT disallowing the insurance premium was vacated, and the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed to that extent.This judgment highlights the importance of proper application of accounting principles and the necessity for expenses to be related to the relevant assessment year for accrual basis accounting.