Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether customs duty on bulk liquid cargo discharged through pipelines into shore tanks is to be assessed on the quantity shown in the ship's ullage survey report or on the quantity actually received in the shore tank, and whether refund is admissible for duty collected on the higher ullage quantity.
Analysis: The dispute concerned imported bulk liquid cargo for which duty had been collected on the ship's ullage quantity, though the quantity actually received in the shore tanks was lower. The Tribunal applied the settled principle that, for bulk liquid cargo discharged into storage tanks, assessment must be based on the quantity actually received in the shore tank. It noted that the Board circular also supported assessment on shore tank receipt where the cargo is discharged into shore tanks, and therefore assessment finalized solely on ship ullage was not correct.
Conclusion: Assessment had to be made on the shore tank quantity, and the assessee was entitled to refund of the duty collected on the excess ullage quantity.
Ratio Decidendi: In the case of bulk liquid cargo discharged into shore tanks, customs duty is leviable on the quantity actually received in the shore tank, not on the higher quantity shown by the ship's ullage survey.