1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Penalty for non-disclosure of tax perquisites deleted for A.Y. 2003-04 & 2004-05</h1> The penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for non-disclosure of tax perquisites in the original return of income for A.Y. 2003-04 and A.Y. ... - Issues involved: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for non-disclosure of tax perquisites in the original return of income for A.Y. 2003-04 and A.Y. 2004-05.For A.Y. 2003-04: The assessee, an employee of a foreign company, voluntarily filed a revised computation of income with CIT-V Pune declaring revised total income. The tax perquisites were included, and incremental tax was deposited along with interest u/s 201(1A). The AO initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) which was challenged before CIT(A) and subsequently deleted based on bonafide explanation and voluntary disclosure.For A.Y. 2004-05: The assessee, an employee of two companies, filed a return of income declaring salary from both companies. The taxes on salary from one company were deducted and paid, while the other company bore the tax liability. Upon discovering potential underreporting, the employer voluntarily reported and deposited the incremental tax. The AO initiated penalty proceedings, which were deleted by CIT(A) and upheld by the Tribunal based on voluntary disclosure and lack of justification for penalty imposition.Conclusion: The penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for non-disclosure of tax perquisites in the original return of income was deleted by CIT(A) and upheld by the Tribunal for both A.Y. 2003-04 and A.Y. 2004-05, considering the voluntary disclosure, bonafide explanation, and lack of justification for penalty imposition.