Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the remission of Rs. 33,343 arising from the compromise of the sale transaction of machinery could be treated as a bad and doubtful debt deductible in computing business income under the Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The machinery had been acquired for business use, the later sale was found to be connected with the normal conduct of the assessee's business, and the transaction was not a mere investment realisation. The contractual interest had been treated and assessed as business income on the mercantile basis in earlier years. The amount subsequently remitted on compromise therefore represented a loss arising in the course of a trading transaction and fell within the allowance for bad and doubtful debts due to the assessee in respect of its business.
Conclusion: The remission was deductible under Section 10(2)(xi) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, and the answer to the reference was in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered by recognising the amount as an allowable business deduction, with costs awarded against the revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a receipt or balance arising from a bona fide trading transaction connected with the ordinary course of business is later compromised and remitted, the resulting shortfall may be treated as a deductible bad or doubtful debt under the mercantile system.