Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether clearances of goods to Special Economic Zone developers were to be treated as exports so that no amount was payable under Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.
Analysis: The appeals turned on the treatment of supplies made to SEZ developers. The Tribunal applied the settled position that such supplies are to be regarded as exports for the relevant purpose. Once the clearances are treated as exports, the mechanism for recovery under Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 does not apply. The amendment and the exception under Rule 6(6) were also held applicable to supplies to SEZ units and SEZ developers/promoters.
Conclusion: The demand under Rule 6 was not sustainable and the impugned orders were set aside.
Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded on merits, and the demand raised on supplies to SEZ developers could not be sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Supplies made to SEZ units or developers are to be treated as exports for the purpose of Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and therefore reversal or payment under that rule is not attracted.