1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>CESTAT AHMEDABAD: Confiscation of excess goods overturned due to lack of evidence. No duty evasion proven. Penalty imposed.</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD upheld the decision setting aside the confiscation of excess goods not entered in the RG-1 register due to lack of ... - The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD upheld the order setting aside confiscation of excess goods not entered in the RG-1 register due to lack of evidence of clandestine removal. The appeal by Revenue was rejected as no intention to evade duty was found. Penalty of Rs. 2,000 was imposed for non-entry of goods in statutory records.