Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Tribunal Affirms 5% Income Estimation for Subcontractor, Dismissing Revenue Appeals for AYs 2006-2007 & 2007-2008.</h1> <h3>ACIT Versus M/s. MAA High Ways</h3> The ITAT resolved cross appeals for AYs 2006-2007 and 2007-2008, focusing on income estimation for a sub-contractor. The Tribunal ruled that the ... AO estimated net profit at 12.5% of the gross contract receipts, rejecting books of accounts - Assessee being a subcontractor, lower rate should be applicable - HELD THAT - Assessee being a sub-contractor, its income should have been estimated at 5% on the subcontract receipts and the assessee is not entitled for any deduction towards depreciation. Decision in favor of assessee. Issues involved: Cross appeals by Revenue and assessee against CIT(A) order for assessment years 2006-2007 and 2007-2008, common issues clubbed together.Issue 1 - Assessment Year 2006-2007:The assessee, a sub-contractor, disputed net profit estimation by Assessing Officer at 12.5% of gross contract receipts. CIT(A) directed income estimation at 8% of gross receipts based on previous rulings. Tribunal held that sub-contractor's income should be estimated at 5% on subcontract receipts with no depreciation deduction allowed.Issue 2 - Assessment Year 2007-2008:Similar to 2006-2007, sub-contract works amounted to a significant sum. CIT(A) gave a similar direction as in the previous year. Tribunal followed the decision for 2006-2007, estimating income at 5% on subcontract receipts with no depreciation deduction allowed.Revenue's Appeals:Revenue appealed CIT(A)'s estimation of gross receipts at 8% instead of 12.5% by Assessing Officer. Tribunal dismissed Revenue's appeals based on the decision regarding sub-contractor income estimation at 5%.In conclusion, the appeals of the assessee for both years were allowed, while the Revenue's appeals were dismissed. The Tribunal emphasized the specific income estimation approach for sub-contractors and the inapplicability of depreciation deductions in such cases.