Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether execution proceedings to enforce an order of an erstwhile Administrative Tribunal fall within the expression "proceeding" under Section 29 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, and whether the Administrative Tribunal constituted under the Act has jurisdiction to enforce such orders.
Analysis: The expression "proceeding" in Section 29 was construed in a broad and comprehensive sense to include the prescribed course of action for enforcing a legal right. Execution was treated as a step in the judicial process and an integral part of the adjudicatory machinery, because the right to enforce an order is incidental to the substantive service dispute already decided by the Tribunal. Since jurisdiction over such service matters had been taken out of civil courts and vested in the Tribunal, the later Tribunal constituted under the Act was held to be the proper forum for enforcement of orders passed by the erstwhile Tribunal.
Conclusion: Execution before the civil court was held not to lie, and the petitioners were required to seek enforcement before the Administrative Tribunal constituted under the Act.
Final Conclusion: The petition failed, and the enforcement remedy was confined to the Administrative Tribunal under the statutory scheme.
Ratio Decidendi: The term "proceeding" in Section 29 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 includes execution/enforcement proceedings, so the Tribunal constituted under the Act has jurisdiction to enforce final orders of the erstwhile Tribunal.