Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether amounts inserted in slot-operated video game machines constituted payment for admission to an entertainment so as to attract entertainment duty under the Act.
Analysis: The definition of entertainment under the Act was construed in the context of the legislative power under Entry 62 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India. Entertainment, for the purpose of the taxing provision, was held to mean an objective amusement or gratification provided to a person by what is seen or heard, and not the subjective thrill derived from the person's own performance. A visitor to the video games parlour did not derive amusement merely on entering the premises or by inserting a coin; the thrill arose only when the player himself operated the mechanism and achieved a score. The payment was therefore for access to the tools enabling self-performance, not for admission to an entertainment supplied by the proprietor.
Conclusion: The coin payments were not payment for admission to entertainment, and no entertainment duty was payable under Section 3 of the Act.
Ratio Decidendi: For a charge of entertainment duty to arise, the proprietor must provide an objective entertainment that is itself likely to amuse or entertain the visitor; a payment made only to enable the visitor's own skill-based performance does not amount to payment for admission to entertainment.