Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether derivative losses incurred in the relevant assessment year, including the period before the stock exchange notification, were speculative losses under section 43(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether the related expenditure could be disallowed on that basis.
Analysis: The definition of speculative transaction in section 43(5) was read with the exception inserted by clause (d) of the proviso by the Finance Act, 2005, effective from 1 April 2006. A derivative transaction falling within the statutory concept of an eligible transaction carried out on a recognized stock exchange was held not to be a speculative transaction for assessment year 2006-07. The notification of the stock exchange was treated as clarificatory and not as overriding the principal statutory scheme. On the facts, the derivative dealings were on a recognized exchange and therefore could not be treated as speculation business, with the consequence that the associated expenditure also could not be disallowed on that footing.
Conclusion: The derivative loss was not speculative loss and the related disallowance was not sustainable; the assessee succeeded on the issue.