Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether additions made in the assessments for the relevant years as estimated income from sources outside the books were justified on the basis of past history and the assessee's failure to file a wealth statement.
Analysis: The only material relied on by the revenue was the existence of alleged past capital and the omission to file a wealth statement. That material, standing alone, did not relate sufficiently to the accounting years in question to justify an inference that concealed income had been earned during those years. Past history may be relevant, but it cannot by itself support an assessment unless there is some material connected with the accounting year from which a reasonable inference of income can be drawn. The initial burden of finding such material lies on the revenue, and it does not shift merely because the assessee does not prove disappearance of past capital.
Conclusion: The additions were not legally sustainable and the question was answered in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The reference was disposed of by holding that estimated additions based only on past history and unsupported presumption could not be upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessment of concealed income for a particular year must rest on some material relatable to that year, and the burden of establishing such material lies on the revenue; past history alone is insufficient.