TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal upholds CIT(A)'s decisions for 2007-08 assessment year, citing lack of fair market value provision and worker statements.</h1> <h3>The ACIT, Circle-1, Ludhiana Versus M/s Saimbhi Cycles & Auto Industries and vice-versa</h3> The ACIT, Circle-1, Ludhiana Versus M/s Saimbhi Cycles & Auto Industries and vice-versa - TMI Issues involved: Appeal against order of CIT(A)-I, Ludhiana for assessment year 2007-08.Ground No.1: The Assessing Officer questioned sales made to a sister concern at lower rates. Assessee justified the rates based on tax implications and differences in sale conditions. AO added amount to income, but CIT(A) deleted the addition. Tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s decision citing lack of provision to estimate fair market value for such sales.Ground No.2: AO denied deduction u/s 80IB for various incomes not directly related to industrial undertaking. CIT(A) allowed deduction only for labor receipts. Tribunal confirmed CIT(A)'s decision based on precedent allowing deduction for job work under u/s 80IB.Ground No.3: AO disallowed bonus and leave wages based on discrepancies in worker statements. CIT(A) deleted the addition after workers confirmed receipt of bonus and leave wages. Tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s decision, noting workers' confirmation and lack of strong basis for disallowance.In conclusion, Revenue appeal was dismissed, and Cross Objections were withdrawn and dismissed. The Tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s decisions on all grounds, emphasizing adherence to legal provisions and worker statements.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
