Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Collector, while issuing a biennial statement of circle rates under Rule 340-A of the U.P. Stamp Rules, 1942, had the competence to prescribe an enhanced rate of 20% for the next year and whether the impugned circular was valid.
Analysis: The circle rate fixed under Rule 340-A is only a prima facie guideline to assist the registering authority in testing whether the value stated in an instrument reflects the real market value. It is not a final or binding determination of market value, and it does not foreclose the inquiry contemplated under Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act. The requirement that the Collector supply the statement biennially means only that it is to be furnished once in two years; it does not prohibit the Collector, if supported by material showing a rising trend in land prices, from indicating a different rate for the succeeding year within the same biennial statement. In the absence of any challenge to the rule itself or to the existence of material before the Collector, the enhancement by 20% could not be treated as beyond power or arbitrary.
Conclusion: The Collector had competence to indicate an enhanced circle rate for the next year, and the impugned circular was valid.
Ratio Decidendi: A circle rate issued under Rule 340-A is only a prima facie administrative guideline for stamp-duty assessment, and the Collector may, on relevant material, prescribe different rates for successive years within a biennial statement without exceeding statutory power.