Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a notice under section 34 of the Income-tax Act, 1922 could validly be issued when the assessee had already filed a return for the assessment year and the assessment on that return had not been completed.
Analysis: The assessee had filed a return for the relevant assessment year before the notice under section 34 was issued. The return may have been inaccurate on the merits, but it was nonetheless a return for that year. Since the Income-tax Officer had not completed an assessment on that return, the attempt to reopen the matter by resort to section 34 was not justified. The subsequent reassessment was founded entirely on that invalid notice.
Conclusion: The notice under section 34 was invalid and the assessment made pursuant to it could not stand; the answer was in favour of the assessee.