TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the deducting authorities were bound to comply with Section 41 of the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 and Rule 29(2) of the Bihar Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 while deducting tax at source from bills for works contracts, and whether flat deduction at the full rate could be made without allowing the deductions contemplated by the statute and rules.
Analysis: The petitioners sought a direction against making flat VAT deductions at source from their bills for works contracts. The legal framework under Section 41 of the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 and Rule 29(2) of the Bihar Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 required deduction to be made only in the manner permitted by those provisions, and not on the entire bill amount where the statutory exclusions or head-wise deductions were applicable. The Court held that the obligation of the deducting authorities was to strictly follow the Act and the Rules, and that once the relevant details were furnished or were otherwise available, deduction could not be made on amounts covered by the excluded heads. It was further directed that any excess deduction already made, if the benefit of the statutory deduction had not been granted, should be adjusted in future bills.
Conclusion: The deducting authorities were required to make tax deduction at source only in conformity with the Act and the Rules, and flat deduction of the entire bill amount without granting the permissible deductions was impermissible.
Final Conclusion: The writ petitions were disposed of with directions requiring the authorities to give effect to the statutory limits on deduction at source and to adjust any excess deduction against future bills where necessary.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statute and rules prescribe exclusions or restricted heads for tax deduction at source, the deducting authority must apply those provisions strictly and cannot make blanket deduction of the full bill amount.
TaxTMI 
